What do you think about the cervical cancer jab for girls the Government are discussing? - cervical cancer ultrasound
This would be the young girls aged 12 to 13 in three doses over six months to a price of £ 300 per course. The vaccine can prevent cancer of the cervix, because it protects against sexually transmitted diseases that lead to human Pappillomavirus HPV means that most cases of cancer of the cervix. The Government has accepted in principle, but need the cost to the NHS checked. I personally think that JAB can not be avoided for women who die from cancer of the cervix in this country (over 1,000 per year), and if it helps, well, then it is. Vaccinations can be started in autumn 2008 and not mandatory. The test program will continue as cervical jab that did not protect against all HPV types. Vaccines against HPV are now available in the UK, but has not been approved for use by the government. Some people are apparently not affected by this is promiscuity jab for girls as it was to increase before they become sexually active. What do you think of this vaccine?
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Cervical Cancer Ultrasound What Do You Think About The Cervical Cancer Jab For Girls The Government Are Discussing?
10 comments:
I think it's a shame that people are so on the fact that it will protect girls against HPV-related cervical cancer addictive. I have been vaccinated against hepatitis, as well, and not to abuse drugs and shares needles have been tried at all. It is a shame that people connected to the whole subject of sexuality. Especially as girls with the HPV-get from a man, absolutely nobody can know who is the head, and whoever they may be in a monogamous couple, even if it has one. I have two girls in and around the age group, and as soon as you imagine it can be vaccinated. I support keeping each bite that can protect my children. If they are sexually active, expect the worst he suffered was a pity. Sorry, the heart can be broken and repaired. HPV is not as easy to solve.
It's a great idea, but it annoys me, as scientists always take inventing things for women, inject, inhale or wear, men's and never the cause of all this first.
Virgin would not get cervical cancer.
The one I like is the proof umbrella. All people should have done this every three years, a Pap smear.
Bloody good idea.
I think it's important that a vaccine for women. However, this vaccine is not very effective if a woman has an HPV infection. Thus the doctors want the women who do not (yet vaccinated or barely) sexually active.
In addition, all HPV types can cause cancer of the cervix. Therefore, the research is focused on causing HPV types that cause cervical cancer. But we must also know that not all cancers of the cervix caused by HPV. The (cancer) that occur without apparent cause, are actually more aggressive and have a higher mortality rate.
It is absolutely wonderful. They are the younger girls so lucky to have the job. Please take the vaccination for their own health.
I think it should be on a voluntary basis, for example. I've heard that by law, to which I say no freaking think so necessary. Mind Your Own Business with Uncle Sam for two, as you say, they do not protect all types of HPV, and not against all causes of cancer of the cervix to. In my opinion, what's the point? You can still end up trying to avoid, especially that all new drugs that are released every year with diseases that kill thousands of people, not so much, or call my kids, but if people want and II for they work so well. I do not think girls are promiscuous.
All that this type of cancer affecting women vile a good thing, can not turn away, regardless of cost. In relation to the promotion of sexual promiscuity among young people, I suggest that the prohibition on the processing of certain magazines for teenagers first HTE. I think this is more of an effect in the wake of the girls always on their sexuality during the treatment ahead.
Good idea, but it needs to act on comprehensive sexuality education. Young people need to know that sex is part of a long-term, mutually exclusive. You must be an expression of love requires. The Bible is clear on this. Not only that, but that gender has very serious side effects from birth through to a variety of serious diseases. Abstinence is stronger than the most effective way, are recommended to avoid the risk of annoying, and sometimes at the risk of side effects.
I believe that everything that can prevent cancer, is a good thing. I bet if these people thought condemn the sting for a moment that was a blow against cancer of the lymphatic system, or lung cancer, support him.
Why are the people in the world so afraid of human sexuality. Almost everyone at some point in their lives, but people say they do not exist or is dirty.
It is an insult to even think that girls are suddenly "begin to have sex" just because a cancer prevention has been found. The same was said about the pill.
Newsflash! The people will have sex or no sex or do not have a preemptive strike against cancers of the cervix.
There is another way to protect our bodies. Condom use. They have a lower risk to be exposed to the virus.
I hope that any form of sex education is self-sufficient with respect to condoms at all times, you do not exist in a monogamous relationship.
One canbe ignorant and do not often see the forest for the trees.
I believe that everything that can prevent cancer, is a good thing. I bet if these people thought condemn the sting for a moment that was a blow against cancer of the lymphatic system, or lung cancer, support him.
Why are the people in the world so afraid of human sexuality. Almost everyone at some point in their lives, but people say they do not exist or is dirty.
It is an insult to even think that girls are suddenly "begin to have sex" just because a cancer prevention has been found. The same was said about the pill.
Newsflash! The people will have sex or no sex or do not have a preemptive strike against cancers of the cervix.
There is another way to protect our bodies. Condom use. They have a lower risk to be exposed to the virus.
I hope that any form of sex education is self-sufficient with respect to condoms at all times, you do not exist in a monogamous relationship.
One canbe ignorant and do not often see the forest for the trees.
Post a Comment